12.26
So yesterday morning, after enjoying what will probably be our last relaxing xmas morning for at least the next 18 years, I got an e-mail giving me a heads up on a killer deal on an MPC5000. It was a fully loaded and hardly used (studio only) 5000 that was being sacrificed cheap to move fast. Basically, the price was low enough that I can sell my 2500 and possibly even make a profit. How sweet is that?
I talked to the wife, because I would have to put the item on a credit card pending sale of the 2500. She agreed, e-mails were sent, and as soon as the post office can get it here, I will have my upgrade! This is awesome.
Basically, this means I can skip rig #1 which was proving to be a bit of a pain anyway. Making a program that could play like a synth patch on the MPC2500 was just not going to be possible, and bringing the TG500 with was going to be headache. Dealing with MIDI, another sound module, and just having to have another rack space that needed to be supplied was not going to be worth it for the short period I was planning to have to do that.
That said, I am also a little nervous about getting a 5000. The buzz on the net was very VERY negative when it was first released. Its 1.0 OS was really a disaster with bugs that, supposedly, made the unit unusable. Of course, a lot of it was also driven by the fact a certain well known producer posted a blog rant about it, and a lot of the hip hip fan boys who buy MPCs because that’s what JAY-Z uses started to echo the complaints. Weather or not 2.0 fixes all the issues seems to depend on who you ask. There is also the fact that I am not your usual MPC user. I am kind of used to that though.
So why do I like the MPC concept so much? Well, it actually stems from a love of samplers in general. Samplers are like a completely blank canvas you can fill however you choose. You get out of a sampler, literally , what you put into it. When I recorded my first album, it was all done with a Synth, a Sequencer and a Sampler. Back in a day when hard disk recorders and DAWS were just a distant idea, it was the sampler that got pushed hardest. The Sampler (an Emu E64 which I still have) was my multi track recorder, my audio mutilator, my synthesizer and my mixer. I did whole tracks in that thing, and they were all done within 10 mb of RAM (this was when loading it to 64 mb would have been $3000).
The MPC5000 really represents that original trinity of Synth, Sequencer and Sampler in one box. In addition, it adds performance controls and FX processing that, even if primitive by today’s standards, is light years ahead of anything I had access to in those early days. Not to sound like an old fart, but when I here people complain about the small amount of RAM the 5000 supports (192mb) I really do laugh on the inside. You would be amazed what you can do with half that. You would be amazed what you can do with 2mb.
Having rambled on enough, I am going to post this and go start backing up all my data off the 2500, and get some tracks ready for loading into the 5k. Its going to be a fun 2010.